Light Waves and Colors Lab Ruberics

This page has been optimized for printing. Feel free to print this to distribut to students!

L1. Score
_____ Included, labeled and organized all parts of the lab report. _____ / _____
_____ Data section includes the provided diagram; nodal and antinodal lines were traced and labeled with an m number. Specific nodal and antinodal points were selected and labeled with a letter; measurements from these points to the two sources (in terms of l) are recorded in the provided data table. Path difference values are recorded (in terms of l) as well.
_____ Conclusion states the equations relating the path difference to the wavelength for nodal and antinodal points. Symbols used within the equation are defined. Equations are accurate and clear.
_____ Discussion of Results describes the evidence leading to each of the equations in the Conclusion section. Specific trials are referenced and discussed to provide evidence for the equation.
L2. Score
_____ Included, labeled and organized all parts of the lab report. _____ / _____
_____ Data section includes the provided graphic and the completed table. Calculations of wavelength are accurate; work is clearly shown for the two methods.
_____ Conclusion/Discussion describes the results of the analysis and compares the effectiveness of the two methods (equations) in calculating the wavelength. The more accurate method should be identified; evidence to support this conclusion is intelligently discussed.
L3. Score
_____ Included, labeled and organized all parts of the lab report. _____ / _____
_____ Data section includes a top view of the experimental set-up; measurements of y, d, m and L are shown on the diagram and equated with their symbol; units are stated. Wavelength calculation is shown; work is clear and accurate; attention is given to the conversion of units. Used nanometers for the wavelength.
_____ Conclusion stated the wavelength of red light in nanometers. The proper number of significant digits is used.
_____ Discussion of Results includes an error analysis; work is shown and labeled for a percent error calculation.
L4. Getting it Right With Light Score
_____ Included, labeled and organized all parts of the lab report. _____ / _____
_____ Data section includes a documented record of the various tests performed with the Polaroid filters. Record is clear and follow-able; reveals a strong ability to document an experimental investigation.
_____ Conclusion/Discussion proposes a physical model of filter construction and light behavior. The model was used to explain the various observations which are documented in the Data section. The discussion is thorough, organized and accurate; reveals a good understanding of Polaroid filters and the role of a scientific model.
L5. Diluted by Distance Lab Score
_____ Included, labeled and organized all parts of the lab report. _____ / _____
_____ Data section includes a table of distance-illuminance data; included column headings and units. Graph of E vs. d is sketched; the results of a linear or a power regression analysis are shown and equation is written. Data appears reasonably accurate.
_____ Conclusion stated the experimentally derived equation relating the illuminance and the distance.
_____ Discussion of Results describes the process used to determine the experimentally derived equation. Includes an error analysis comparing the experimentally derived equation and the theoretical equation.
L6. Color Addition Lab Score
_____ Included, labeled and organized all parts of the lab report. _____ / _____
_____ Data section includes the provided table.
_____ Conclusion/Discussion clearly and accurately states four rules of adding two or more of the primary colors of light in equal intensity and discusses the result of adding primary colors of light in unequal intensity.
L7. Taking Away from RGB Lab Score
_____ Included, labeled and organized all parts of the lab report. _____ / _____
_____ Data section includes labeled color diagrams in which colored markers were mixed on various locations of the page. Colors being mixed were labeled; results are clearly documented.
_____ Conclusion/Discussion describes the seven different results (R, G, B, C, Y, M, Black) and explains the results in terms of the subtraction of primary light colors from the original RGB incident light. Explanations are accurate and thorough.
L8. Painting with CMY Lab Score
_____ Included, labeled and organized all parts of the lab report. _____ / _____
_____ Data section includes the provided table; answers are given and accurate.
_____ Conclusion/Discussion includes a thorough and accurate discussion of the strategy used to predict the result of mixing two or more primary pigments. Discussion centers around the strategy (not the answers). Discussion elaborates on the topic, is accurate, not vague nor ambiguous. Discussion reveals understanding.
L9. Filtering Away Lab Score
_____ Included, labeled and organized all parts of the lab report. _____ / _____
_____ Data section includes the provided table of observations; observations are meaningful and reasonably accurate.
_____ Conclusion/Discussion includes a thorough discussion of the strategy used to predict the result of any given incident color on any given filter. Logic is clearly presented. Discussion centers around the strategy (not the answers). Discussion elaborates on the topic, is accurate, not vague nor ambiguous. Discussion reveals understanding.